
Fast Facts
We’ve put together some fast facts to help people better understand the Mental Health Act and involuntary treatment in BC.
BC’s Mental Health Act Overview
The Mental Health Act is one of the main laws in BC that governs mental health and substance use health care. It sets out when you can be admitted to hospital and treated for what the Act calls a “mental disorder”, either because you ask for that care or because you are being detained and involuntarily treated. This law impacts people diagnosed with mental illness, brain injuries, dementia, substance use related health issues, and many other disability or health conditions.
There is growing evidence that the Mental Health Act is not serving BC well. Emerging investigations from independent offices and compelling stories from people with experience of the mental health system and the loved ones who support them all point to the same thing. BC needs an independent review of the Mental Health Act to create reforms that respect human rights, promote evidence-based care, and build in oversight from an independent provincial Mental Health Advocate.
-
The Mental Health Act was passed in 1964 and many portions of it still remain the same today. The last time the law was substantively amended was 1998.
Update: Since this was written, amendments were made to the Mental Health Act on June 2, 2022. You can learn more about this here.
The Mental Health Act still treats mental health issues as moral failings that can be disciplined out of people. For example, section 32 of the Mental Health Act states that every patient is “during detention, subject to the direction and discipline” of the facility staff. This means that patients can be solitarily confined in seclusion rooms, mechanically restrained with straps that tie them to their beds, or otherwise punished during their time in hospital. There are no limits on when, how, or why someone can be subject to these restraints and no review.
In its January 2021 investigation into the Mental Health Act, the Representative for Children and Youth observed that there should be strict limits on the use of restraints – “To permit the unregulated use of restraint and confinement of patients, and specifically of children, is unacceptable.” (1)
-
People in BC often cannot get access to mental health and substance use services when they ask for help, while at the same time there have been significant increases in the rates of involuntary treatment. The way the Mental Health Act is structured and used makes involuntary treatment a primary way to provide care. This becomes a reinforcing negative cycle. If people can’t get services when they ask for help, their health may worsen until they are in a crisis. And detention and involuntary treatment itself can create negative or traumatizing experiences that alienate people from services in the future.
The criteria for involuntary admission and treatment in the Mental Health Act were expanded in 1998 and the procedural safeguards were reduced. After those amendments, the rates of detention have increased dramatically, but the Act has never been evaluated since that time.
The Ombudsperson documented that rates of detention under the Mental Health Act increased by 71% between 2005/06 and 2016/17, while the rates of voluntary admission have stagnated and decreased per capita. (2)
The Representative for Children and Youth documented detentions of children and youth under the Mental Health Act increased by 162% between 2008/09 and 2017/18. (3)
BC now has the highest rate of hospitalization due to mental illness and substance use in Canada. (4)
-
When we access health care, the law protects our right to make our own health care consent decisions. If we are incapable of understanding and making a health care decision, the law protects our right to have the people who know us best make the decision, like our families. But the Mental Health Act removes health care consent rights for involuntary patients. All involuntary patients can be administered any form of psychiatric treatment the facility chooses without consent. That means involuntary patients aren’t assessed to see whether they are capable of making decisions and families and supporters are excluded from decision-making on behalf of their loved ones. This does not happen for physical health care; if someone is incapable of making physical treatment decisions, the people they trust and know them best act as substitute decision-makers.
The Mental Health Act was recently criticized for non-compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities by the Special Rapporteur following an inspection of Canada, who found that “the Mental Health Act of British Columbia contains very broad criteria for involuntary admissions and, once detained, a person can be forcibly treated without their free and informed consent, including forced medication and electroconvulsive therapy”. (5)
-
In 1998 the BC government created a provincial Mental Health Advocate after findings from the Ombudsperson’s office of a “significant gap in advocacy” for mental health patients. (6) However, the BC Mental Health Advocate office was abolished in 2001 following an election, despite an external evaluation that concluded the office should be retained. (7)
Independent offices have documented widespread non-compliance with basic legal requirements and fundamental human rights in BC’s mental health and substance use care system. For example, the Ombudsperson’s 2019 investigation found that detaining facilities completed the basic legal requirements when detaining someone under the Mental Health Act only 28% of the time. (8) The Representative for Children and Youth found numerous examples of children and youth who had not been informed of their legal rights. (9) These one-time investigations speak to the need for ongoing, built-in, independent oversight, for example, from a provincial Mental Health Advocate.
Other Canadian jurisdictions have enshrined provincial Mental Health Advocates in their mental health legislation (10) or have hired former judges and independent investigators to conduct reviews of their mental health legislation to ensure their laws are regularly evaluated and improved. (11)
Sources
Office of the Representative for Children and Youth, “Detained: Rights of Children and Youth under the Mental Health Act” (January 2021) [Detained: Rights of Children and Youth under the Mental Health Act] at 59.
Office of the Ombudsperson, “Committed to Change: Protecting the Rights of Involuntary Patients under the Mental Health Act”, Special Report No. 42 (March 2019) [Committed to Change] at 15.
Detained: Rights of Children and Youth under the Mental Health Act at 5 and 29.
British Columbia Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions, “A Pathway to Hope: A roadmap for making mental health and addictions care better for people in British Columbia” (June 26, 2019), p. 5.
End of Mission Statement by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities, Ms. Catalina Devandas-Aguilar, on her visit to Canada (April 12, 2019).
Office of the Ombudsperson, ‘Listening: A Review of Riverview Hospital”, Public Report No. 33 (May 1994) at 10-1.
Report of the Evaluation of the Role of the Mental Health Advocate for British Columbia, by Dr. Nick Poushinsky (December 28, 1999) at 8.
Committed to Change at 7.
Detained: Rights of Children and Youth under the Mental Health Act at 47.
For example, Alberta established the Mental Health Patient Advocate in 1990 under the Alberta Mental Health Act: https://www.alberta.ca/alberta-mental-health-patient-advocate.aspx.
For example, Nova Scotia engaged a former Supreme Court of Canada judge to conduct an independent report, Minister of Health and Wellness, “Report of the Independent Panel to Review the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act and Community Treatment Orders”, by Gérard V. La Forest and William Lahey (July, 10, 2013) and Ontario engaged with an independent agency to review amended mental health legislation with Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, “The Legislated Review of Community Treatment Orders”, prepared by R.A. Malatest & Associates (May 23, 2012).
Involuntary Treatment in BC in 2024
This list of 10 facts aims to provide basic facts from law, data, and research so we can have better informed conversations about the current state of involuntary treatment in BC, as of 2024.
The Facts
-
The Mental Health Act is one of the main laws in BC that authorizes police to apprehend someone and take them to a health care facility, where doctors and nurse practitioners can detain someone against their will and administer involuntary treatment. [1]
There is no limit on how long someone can be detained or involuntarily treated. The Mental Health Act authorizes detention and involuntary treatment to be imposed indefinitely for the rest of someone’s life. [2]
-
The Mental Health Act authorizes doctors to place involuntary patients in the community on leave from a detaining facility while they are still being administered involuntary treatment. [3]
Involuntary patients on extended leave in the community are subject to conditions they must comply with, and they are closely supervised by mental health teams. [4]
-
1 in 5 people detained and involuntarily treated under the BC Mental Health Act have a primary diagnosis of substance use disorder. This makes substance use disorders the third most common type of diagnosis for involuntary patients. [5]
Substance use disorders represented the largest growing diagnosis type for people detained and involuntarily treated under the Mental Health Act over the time period 2008/2009 to 2017/2018, with a 139% increase. [6]
-
There are no age parameters on detention and involuntary treatment under the BC Mental Health Act. Children and youth of any age can be apprehended by police and involuntarily admitted to facilities by physicians or nurse practitioners. [7]
Children and youth do not have the right to make autonomous decisions about their treatment when they are involuntary patients under the Mental Health Act. Just like adults, they are subject to involuntary treatment that is unilaterally determined by their doctor. [8]
The Representative for Children and Youth found that the number of children and youth who are detained and involuntarily treated has “increased alarmingly.” Between 2008/09 and 2017/18 involuntary admissions of children and youth rose by 162%. [9]
-
While Riverview Hospital closed in 2012, there are currently over 70 facilities in BC where people can be detained for mental health and substance use health treatment throughout the province, including a detaining facility that currently operates on the grounds of the former Riverview Hospital. [10]
There are secure, locked units in facilities where people are detained under the Mental Health Act and involuntary patients cannot leave without permission from the treatment team. [11]
-
There have always been forms of detention and involuntary treatment for people with disabilities, mental health issues, and substance use health issues in BC since colonization began. However, the use of detention and involuntary treatment has been dramatically increasing in BC since the mid-2000s. [12]
The rates of detention and involuntary treatment under BC’s Mental Health Act have doubled in the last 15 years. [13] There are now over 20,000 people detained under the Mental Health Act in BC every year. [14] To put that in perspective, there were only 662 patients at Riverview Hospital in the year 2000. [15]
The number of involuntary patients who are placed in the community on extended leave while receiving involuntary treatment has increased significantly in recent years. In 2008/2009 there were 848 people placed from detaining facilities on extended leave and in 2021/2022 that number reached 3,567. [16]
-
The law generally protects the right of adults to make our own health care consent decisions. It presumes we are capable of making those decisions unless we are assessed as incapable.[17] When we are assessed as incapable of making a health care consent decision, the law protects our right to have the people who know us best make the decision, like our families or other personal supporters we choose. [18] However, these rights are removed for involuntary patients under BC’s Mental Health Act. [19]
BC’s “deemed consent” laws mean that anyone can be made an involuntary patient, and all involuntary patients are “deemed” to consent to any form of psychiatric treatment the doctor chooses. There are no requirements to assess whether a person can make their own treatment decisions, to ask the person for consent, or to involve loved ones like the person’s family members or friends. [20]
-
The Mental Health Act states that every patient is “during detention, subject to the direction and discipline” of the facility staff. [21] This means that patients can be solitarily confined in seclusion rooms, mechanically restrained with straps that tie them to their beds, or otherwise punished. There are no limits on when, how, or why someone can be subject to these restraints and no independent review.
The Representative for Children and Youth has criticized this authorization in the Mental Health Act: “To permit the unregulated use of restraint and confinement of patients, and specifically of children, is unacceptable.” [22]
-
Unlike other laws that authorize serious impacts on rights and freedoms, [23] there is no independent review automatically built in for detention and involuntary treatment under the Mental Health Act. Instead, an independent review by a tribunal or court only takes place if involuntary patients make a request for one – the result is only approximately 3% of detentions are independently reviewed annually. [24]
Other Canadian jurisdictions have enshrined provincial Mental Health Advocates in their mental health legislation or have hired former judges and independent investigators to conduct reviews of their mental health legislation to ensure their laws are regularly evaluated and improved. [25] BC’s Mental Health Act has never been independently evaluated and reviewed.
-
There is little evidence to show that detention and involuntary treatment improves the health, safety, and well-being of individuals who receive the involuntary treatment or their surrounding communities.
Studies have generally not found evidence that involuntary substance use health treatment leads to improved outcomes (like lower rates of substance use or lower rates of engaging in criminal activity in the future), and some studies show there are potential harms from the involuntary treatment (such as higher rates of overdose and drug poisoning deaths following release). [26]
Studies have generally demonstrated that people who received compulsory mental health treatment in the community were no more likely to be connected with services, did not have higher rates of social functioning, mental state, or quality of life, and did not have lower rates of readmission to hospital when compared with people who received voluntary treatment.[27]
People who are detained and treated against their will can experience trauma and harms leading to fear and avoidance of health care services.[28]
While other places in Canada and the world have mental health laws that reflect commitments to providing a range of mental health services, BC has no standardized set of services that are consistently available during involuntary treatment. [29] Instead, there is evidence that a range of holistic, person-centred supports are often not available during involuntary treatment in BC. [30]
The Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction report that government refers to in its September 15, 2024 announcement says that systemic studies examining the effectiveness of involuntary care for people with substance use disorders “are limited and inconclusive” and focus groups with people with lived and living experience with substance use “did not endorse involuntary care under the inadequate conditions of the existing health system.” [31]
Sources
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c288, sections 20 and 22. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c288, sections 20 and 24. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c288, section 37. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
BC Government, Guide to the Mental Health Act, 2005. https://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2005/MentalHealthGuide.pdf
Jackson P. Loyal, M. Ruth Lavergne & Will Small, Trends in Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization in British Columbia: Descriptive Analysis of Population-Based Linked Administrative Data from 2008 to 2018, published in Canadian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 68, Issue 4, 2024. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/07067437221128477#bibr4-07067437221128477
Jackson P. Loyal, M. Ruth Lavergne & Will Small, Trends in Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization in British Columbia: Descriptive Analysis of Population-Based Linked Administrative Data from 2008 to 2018, published in Canadian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 68, Issue 4, 2024. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/07067437221128477#bibr4-07067437221128477
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c 288, section 22. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c 288, section 31. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Representative for Children and Youth, Detained: Rights of children and youth under the Mental Health Act, 2021, page 29. https://rcybc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RCY_Detained-Jan2021.FINAL_.pdf
BC Government, Designations under the Mental Health Act section 3(1) and 3(2), Ministerial Order M 393/2016. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/managing-your-health/mental-health-substance-use/facilities-designated-mental-health-act.pdf
BC Government, Guide to the Mental Health Act, 2005. www.bcmhrb.ca/app/uploads/sites/431/2018/11/Mental-Health-Guide-by-Ministry-of-Health-2005.pdf
Laura Johnston, Operating in Darkness: BC’s Mental Health Act Detention System, published by Community Legal Assistance Society, 2017, page 24. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/clastest/pages/1794/attachments/original/1527278723/CLAS_Operating_in_Darkness_November_2017.pdf?1527278723
Office of the Ombudsperson, Systemic Investigation update: Report on the Implementation of the Recommendations from Committed to Change: Protecting the Rights of Involuntary Patients under the Mental Health Act, 2022, page 31. https://bcombudsperson.ca/assets/media/Committed-to-Change_Report-Update_July21-2022.pdf ;
BC Ministry of Health Consolidated Analytics Services, Mental Health Hospitalizations in BC: Voluntary and Involuntary Discharges (detained under the Mental Health Act with one or two certificates at sometime during the stay, 2008/09 - 2015/16), Freedom of Information (FOI) Request HTH-2017-72558, 2017Office of the Ombudsperson, Systemic Investigation update: Report on the Implementation of the Recommendations from Committed to Change: Protecting the Rights of Involuntary Patients under the Mental Health Act, 2022, page 31. https://bcombudsperson.ca/assets/media/Committed-to-Change_Report-Update_July21-2022.pdf ;
BC Ministry of Health Consolidated Analytics Services, Mental Health Hospitalizations in BC: Voluntary and Involuntary Discharges (detained under the Mental Health Act with one or two certificates at sometime during the stay, 2008/09 - 2015/16), Freedom of Information (FOI) Request HTH-2017-72558, 2017.
British Columbia Mental Health and Addiction Services, Riverview Hospital: A Legacy of Care and Compassion (Revised edition), 2010. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e34ed207332cf46d561c2da/t/638977a93bf83439023bd24e/1669953470122/Riverview+Hospital_History.pdf
Ministry of Health, Health Sector Information, Analysis Reporting Division, Annual case counts of involuntary patients released on extended leave pursuant to the Mental Health Act. (Date Range for Record Search: From 4/1/2016 To 3/31/2022), Freedom of Information (FOI) Request HTH-2022-21471, 2022;
BC Ministry of Health Consolidated Analytics Services, Mental Health Hospitalizations in BC: Voluntary and Involuntary Discharges (detained under the Mental Health Act with one or two certificates at sometime during the stay, 2008/09 - 2015/16), Freedom of Information (FOI) Request HTH-2017-72558, 2017.
Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, RSBC 1996, c181, section 3. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96181_01
Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, RSBC 1996, c 181. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96181_01
Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, RSBC 1996, c 181, section 2. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96181_01;
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c288, section 31. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c 288, section 31. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Mental Health Act, RSBC 1996, c 288, section 32. www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96288_01
Representative for Children and Youth, Detained: Rights of children and youth under the Mental Health Act, 2021, page 59. https://rcybc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RCY_Detained-Jan2021.FINAL_.pdf
See for example, Corrections and Conditional Release Act, SC 1992, c 20, Part 3. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-44.6;
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, RSC 1985, c R-10 at Part VI. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/R-10;
Police Act, RSBC 1996, c 367, Parts 7.1 and 9. https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96367_01;
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, section 57. https://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-2.5.
Health Justice, Upstream Barriers, Downstream Crisis: Denial of Justice under BC’s Mental Health Act, 2024, page 84. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e34ed207332cf46d561c2da/t/663a5d6cad7d53078a2565a3/1715101070129/FINAL_MAY07_DenialofJustice_optimizedforweb.pdf
For example, Alberta established the Mental Health Patient Advocate in 1990 under the Alberta Mental Health Act: https://www.alberta.ca/alberta-mental-health-patient-advocate.aspx;
Nova Scotia engaged a former Supreme Court of Canada judge to conduct an independent report, Minister of Health and Wellness, “Report of the Independent Panel to Review the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act and Community Treatment Orders”, by Gérard V. La Forest and William Lahey (July, 10, 2013): https://novascotia.ca/dhw/mental-health/reports/IPTA-Review-2013.pdf;
Every five years, Ontario engages with an independent agency to review amended mental health legislation with Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, The Third Review of Community Treatment Orders, prepared by R.A. Malatest & Associates, 2019: https://files.ontario.ca/moh-third-review-community-treatment-orders-dec-2019-en-2023-03-09.pdf
D. Werb & al., The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: A systematic review, published in International Journal of Drug Policy, Volume 28, 2016, pages 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.005;
Andreas Pilarinos & al., Secure care: More harm than good, published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, Volume 190, Issue 41, 2018, pages 1219-1220. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/190/41/E1219
Steve Kisely, Leslie Anne Campbell & Richard O’Reilly, Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders, published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017, Issue 3. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub5/full ;
Jorun Rugkåsa, Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: The International Evidence, published in Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Volume 61, Issue 1, 2016, pages 15-24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756604/
Tara Seed, John Fox & Katherine Berry, The experience of involuntary detention in acute psychiatric care. A review and synthesis of qualitative studies, published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, Volume 61, 2016, pages 82-94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27314181 ;
Representative for Children and Youth, Detained: Rights of children and youth under the Mental Health Act, 2021. https://rcybc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RCY_Detained-Jan2021.FINAL_.pdf
Health Justice, A Path Forward: Human rights-based guiding principles for BC’s mental health law and services, 2022, pages 42-51, and 57-62. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e34ed207332cf46d561c2da/t/6441b4d29e4f84365c114a9f/1682027749916/FINAL_APR2023_GuidingPrinciples_HealthJustice_Updated.pdf
Health Justice, “Pathologize the systems and not the people”: Decolonizing BC’s mental health law, 2023, pages 60-64. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e34ed207332cf46d561c2da/t/656946dc3b442563d8a0a69d/1701398248704/FINAL_+Pub2_PathologizeTheSystemsNotPeople_Optimized.pdf
Representative for Children and Youth, Detained: Rights of children and youth under the Mental Health Act, 2021, page 70, recommendation 9. https://rcybc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RCY_Detained-Jan2021.FINAL_.pdf;
Health Justice, A Path Forward: Human rights-based guiding principles for BC’s mental health law and services, 2022, pages 42-51, and 57-62. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e34ed207332cf46d561c2da/t/6441b4d29e4f84365c114a9f/1682027749916/FINAL_APR2023_GuidingPrinciples_HealthJustice_Updated.pdf
Daniel Vigo et al., Exploring Care Options for Individuals with Severe Substance Use Disorders in British Columbia: Final Report, 2019. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/conducting-health-research/exploring-care-options-for-individuals-with-severe-substance-use-disorders-in-british-columbia.pdf